Q: What is the objective of #OpDeathEaters?
A: The objective of #OpDeathEaters is an independent, internationally linked, victim-led inquiry/tribunal into the child trafficking and paedosadist industry.
Q: What do all those words mean?
A: Independent of all institutions potentially being investigated for complicity.
Autonomous to each region but internationally communicating and co-operating.
Run by qualified and experienced people who the victims and general public can trust.
Legally binding inquiry to gather evidence for the justice system unless the justice system is deemed by the public to be so corrupt that independent, legally binding tribunals are necessary.
Paedosadist industry includes all the industries using children as products, whether for rape, other sadism, ritual killings, labour slavery, organs, drugs and trafficking mules or militias. These industries are impossible to separate.
Q: What is a death eater?
A: A member of a sociopathic society where the societal norms or culture are driven by sadism or sexual sadism disorder. The agony of others is not a side effect of their actions but a goal. Death eaters are distinct from those with an individual personality disorder in that their society’s norms, structure and actions are all constructed to feed and support their sadism.
Q: What is the difference between a pedosadist and the sexual orientation of pedophilia?
A: There is no such thing as a sexual orientation called paedophilia. A sexual orientation, or sex, requires consenting partners. It is not sex if some of those involved are called victims, that is rape. Someone attracted to rape has sexual sadism disorder or paraphilic coercive disorder. Someone attracted to the rape of children is a paedosadist. A paedosadist who acts on their impulses is a criminal paedosadist, one who does not is a non-offending paedosadist.
Q: What is the difference between paedosadist and pedosadist?
A: Paedosadist is the UK spelling, pedosadist is US.
Q: Is OpDeathEaters going after paedosadists on the deep dark web?
A: No, the media made that up because they didn’t want to say we were going after paedosadists in parliament and other powerful institutions. But if we get rid of the ones in institutions of power, we are confident we can get rid of those on the web as well, deep or no.
Q: How do I report paedosadist imagery on the Internet?
A: Talk to our comrades at #OpPedoHunt. #OpDeathEaters focuses on high level complicity, obstruction of justice, cover ups, and child trafficking.
Q: Where do I donate to #OpDeathEaters?
A: OpDeathEaters is a global idea and the duty of all adults. Do not ever donate to anyone claiming to be #OpDeathEaters.
Q: Is OpDeathEaters calling for vigilante justice?
A: No. #OpDeathEaters is calling for legally binding inquiries and, if necessary, tribunals.
Q: Which inquiry does #OpDeathEaters support?
A: It is not #OpDeathEaters business to choose or support one inquiry over another. We support the right of the people to choose an inquiry format and panel which they can trust.
Q: When will Anonymous be finished setting up inquiries?
A: #OpDeathEaters is for all adults, not just Anonymous. To get support for inquiries we need easily presented facts and the best case(s) which need to be (re)opened and we need discussion forums on reddit, facebook, google+, instagram, Pinterest, tumblr, blogs, community halls, news media, everywhere. We need to have a global network of people committed enough to do the research and build community suppport in each region. We can then spread that information as widely as possible and organize inquiries. There will be no inquiries of any kind without massive public support.
Q: Is Anonymous going to hack and find evidence of high level paedosadists?
A: There is no need for anyone associated with #opDeathEaters to ever hack a site or view illegal images. All of the evidence we need to establish a need for inquiries is publicly available. In the UK, even attempting to call up an illegal image is called ‘creating’ a child abuse image and is a crime. Don’t do it. Hacked evidence is inadmissible in court and you could mess up a real investigation. Don’t do that either.
Q: But the media told me all Anonymous were hackers?
A: Not really. The only hacking we are doing this time is writing code. That’s not illegal yet.
Q: What if someone on the #OpDeathEaters tag told me to hack or download child abuse?
A: Block them and report them to twitter for abuse and tell others to do the same.
Q: I did support #OpDeathEaters but someone on the tag said something I disagree with.
A: We do not control Twitter. We are only responsible for the information we collect for the database.
Q: No one is the boss of Anonymous. You can’t decide what OpDeathEaters is.
A: No one can tell Anonymous what to do and everyone is free to help an op or not as they choose. But if they disagree with the core objectives of the op (as written here) they may be Anonymous but they aren’t part of OpDeathEaters. That’s how it works.
Q: How do I give testimony to #opDeathEaters?
A: At this tme, OpDeathEaters has no way of ensuring your safety, providing emotional support or ensuring your information will be acted on. Fight for a legally recognized, independent, victim-led inquiry which can provide a safe place for victim and witness testimony.
Q: But I have really important information and I want to tell you anyway?
A: Make 3 copies of it and pass it as either encrypted files or in person to people you trust will get it to the right place when it is safe to do so. Also, see if you can find a reporter who understands source protection to publish your information. If your information is legally actionable, try taking it to a lawyer and seeking justice. If that is not an option, at least try to present your information in legally actionable affidavit format when passing it to others. The database will eventually allow secure affidavit uploading, not for public viewing but to be collected by human rights law firms or inquiries. Talk to Heather Marsh (@GeorgieBC) after the database is live if you are a human rights lawyer and wish to help with that. The database may eventually be used to upload affidavits to inquiries after they are established.
Q: Where is the database?
It is currently under development, you can help out here: https://www.getgee.xyz/
Q: Why do we need a database?
A: We need to change the way we do journalism so we can better understand the context, history and dependencies of these networks. Background:
News, analysis, action https://georgiebc.wordpress.com/2013/11/02/news-analysis-action/
Good-bye Wikipedia, hello something else https://georgiebc.wordpress.com/2013/10/21/good-bye-wikipedia-hello-something-else/
Our right to communicate https://georgiebc.wordpress.com/2013/04/16/our-right-to-communicate/
2010: Why we didn’t know our ruling classes were paedosadists. https://georgiebc.wordpress.com/2010/11/22/the-new-social-register/
Q: What kind of data will opDeathEaters collect?
A: We are looking for primary source, court documents and mainstream media reports. Using mainstream media and above sources is legal protection against false accusation and libel. As @der_bluthund points out, we can use blogs if they are by a recognized expert such as a lawyer, social worker, police or similar. Our first objective is to create a database which will track the influence networks around known cases. http://www.hundhaus.uk/2015/01/opdeatheaters-research-101/
When the database is operative we will work with human rights law firms (or hopefully established independent inquiries) to allow victim testimony in affidavit format to be submitted confidentially to those legally empowered to act on it. We have two primary obstacles for those seeking justice: the powerful support and perceived credibility of the accused and the frequently very vulnerable positions of the accusers. Many former victims are drug addicts as they were fed drugs by their abusers from a very young age. Many have mental health issues and are in institutions of one kind or another. Those in refugee camps or otherwise dependent have no voice to the outside. They are very vulnerable to being silenced. In order to have true equality under the law, we have to both remove (and prosecute) the support networks covering for the accused and proactively protect and seek testimony from the vulnerable. It is not enough to simply ask that they come forward when many are in no position to do so.
Q: Will the database just be looking at child rapists?
A: No. It is impossible to separate child rapists from those using children for ritual killings, organ harvesting, militias, slaves, drugs and weapons trafficking mules and more. We are also not looking at just those participating directly in paedosadism, we are looking at the influence networks of obstruction of justice and potential blackmail upholding them.
Q: Why are people mentioning the Clintons when he has not been accused of paedosadism?
A: The US Attorney General’s instruction to the US Justice Department was to “pursue justice without making a political mess”. The connection between Epstein and the Clintons, among others, could be seen as a possible factor in Epstein serving only 13 months of ‘house arrest’ (which included regular flights to the US virgin islands and NY) for criminal activity which would usually have resulted in a far stronger sentence. That relationship could then be considered a reason the case should have gone to an independent, victim-led tribunal protected by transparency and public support.
Q: What about Prince Andrew? Sex with a 17 year old wasn’t even illegal in the jurisdictions it occurred?
A: We are interested in Prince Andrew for potential blackmail, obstruction of justice and influence peddling in criminal networks. He has also been accused of participating in an underaged sex orgy.
Q: Is this just a UK / US op?
A: Phase one was @opGabon. This is a problem in every state and international organization of any size.
Q: Aren’t there NGOs fighting this?
A: We have found infilteration of NGOs, HelpLines, police, and every type of organization set up ostensibly to aid victims. A high level mafia will always co-opt any organization their victims will run to.
Q: Why don’t you leave it to international organizations like the United Nations and Interpol?
A: There have been high level complicity and cover-ups there too.
Q: Is it just the Catholic church?
A: We have evidence from every major religious group. Where there is power, secrecy and impunity, there is paedosadism.
Q: So is it the Masons? Or the Illuminati?
A: Whatever the origins, this is a problem that not only spans the globe but also is throughout every layer of society and can no longer be pinned to one group or reason. It is like metastasized cancer at this point.
Q: Why are you going after the top?
A: This is an industry. Going after the consumers while leaving those who create and enable the industry and the advertising for the industry intact will never work. Many paedsosadists are former victims and, as in the drug industry, the current laws have served as a means to blackmail victims and witnesses who may otherwise have gone to the police.
Q: What about WeProtect? Aren’t they doing the same thing?
A: WeProtect is an Internet censorship campaign aimed at blocking search results into paedosadism so the public will never be able to research a project such as opDeathEaters again. It also promises to arrest a lot of low level people (like victims and witnesses) and fill the prisons, but the same government is still blocking an inquiry into high level complicity in paedosadism. #WeProtect is the top planning to arrest the bottom. #OpDeathEaters is the bottom planning to arrest the top.
Q: What should we do about this? Should we kill all pedosadists or put them in jail or what?
A: We created the paedosadism industry, we can dismantle it.
Free will and seductive coercion https://georgiebc.wordpress.com/2014/04/22/free-will-and-seductive-coercion/
A mythical Manichean world https://georgiebc.wordpress.com/2014/11/19/a-mythical-manichean-world/
How we came to be ruled by Death Eaters https://georgiebc.wordpress.com/2014/12/05/how-we-came-to-be-ruled-by-death-eaters/
The other Battle for the Internet https://georgiebc.wordpress.com/2014/11/08/the-other-battle-for-the-internet/
Q: When did #OpDeathEaters start?
A: This phase of OpDeathEaters started in November, 2014 but the first phase was @OpGabon in early 2013 and there are overlaps with @opRohingya and @opKachin as well.
Q: Who is leading #opDeathEaters?
A: No one. #OpDeathEaters is idea driven https://georgiebc.wordpress.com/2012/12/01/idea-and-action-driven-systems/ stigmergic action ( https://georgiebc.wordpress.com/2012/12/24/stigmergy-2/) We are all aiming for the same objective but how you help us get there is your choice (which doesn’t mean you won’t get negative feedback if others don’t agree with your choice).
Q: Ok, but whose idea was #opDeathEaters?
A: Heather Marsh (@georgiebc).
OpDeatheaters historical background:
How we came to be ruled by Death Eaters: https://georgiebc.wordpress.com/2014/12/05/how-we-came-to-be-ruled-by-death-eaters/
Sociopaths, Psychopaths and Death Eaters: https://georgiebc.wordpress.com/2014/11/23/sociopaths-psychopaths-and-death-eaters/
The other Battle for the Internet: https://georgiebc.wordpress.com/2014/11/08/the-other-battle-for-the-internet/
Installing new governance: http://georgiebc.wordpress.com/2014/11/12/installing-new-governance/
Witches and how they are silenced: http://georgiebc.wordpress.com/2014/05/01/witches-and-how-they-are-silenced/
2012: Internet and paedosadists (at 11:40):
2013: Internet and paedosadists again (at 45.)
2014: Internet and paedosadists again (pp 8-9)
Q: Are there main accounts I should follow?
A:Twitter: @opDeathEaters, @GeorgieBC, @YourAnonCentral and this
Facebook group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/1522133861392796/
Q: I want #opDeathEaters to be a big success in my country but the official Anonymous OpDeathEaters account for my state isn’t doing much.
A: There are no official accounts. Start another. Most accounts start with @opDeathEaters or @opDE so we can find them easily. They are for focused research and organizing. They can be formed for specific regions, NGO’s, UN, militaries, churches, corporations, wherever your interest lies.
Q: I’m not good at research or organizing so I am just retweeting and tweeting old tweets all day long. It’s getting boring.
A: Please spread that information to Facebook, reddit, Instagram, Google+, Tumblr, everywhere else you can think of.
Q: I’ve been working on #opDeathEaters and a journalist wants to talk to me. What should I say?
A: Refer them to the FAQ and then answer their questions. As long as no one contradicts the FAQ, anyone can talk about their experiences working on the op.
Q: A lot of the words I am hearing are new to me and they aren’t the same as I hear on the news.
A: This may help…
- Glossary: https://georgiebc.wordpress.com/category/glossary/
- New Orwellian Dictionary: https://georgiebc.wordpress.com/category/new-orwellian-dictionary-nod/
Q: Why use the term “death eaters”? The people you are describing are the utmost depraved perverts on the planet but to get all of this into the heads of the mainstream majority, I just think we need to use more familiar and simpler terms to describe these psycho’s and their evil actions.
A: We really don’t have a term to describe these people. That has been used to block this story for years, as soon as anyone mentions the topic their listeners demand to know who the group is and the conversation descends into ‘the Illuminati’ or ‘the Masons’ or ‘the Satanists’. There are depraved perverts at all levels of society, we are not talking about all of them (and neither of those words suit our meaning in any case). Also, there are people who are very much part of death eaters society who are not paedosadists or even involved in trafficking, they just live within, enable and protect the society and allow it to exist. So a choice, invent a completely new gobbledegook word or use one which everyone understands and is also a completely accurate term for what we mean. Anything less would be rationalizing, normalizing and completely false terminology like ‘paedophile’, comforting to the listeners and allowing them to settle back into slumber in famliar surroundings. We have seen this in the lies presenting child torture and murder around the world as ‘war’, ‘national security’, ‘policing’, etc., and the word ‘paedophile’ had already almost fully buried this story in the UK. This is really our last chance to NOT use familiar and simple terms and confront the fact that we are in fact ruled by death eaters.
Who controls the words controls your thoughts.
Q: How can you guarantee I won’t be arrested or harmed if I fight for the arrest of a powerful mafia?
A: We can’t. Adults assess the level of potential risk they are willing to take to keep children safe from real torture. It is the job of children to reach adulthood, it is the job of adults to do something with their adult lives. The only guarantee in life is death. Your only choice is what you do in the interim.
Q: Oh. Well, any tips at least?
A: The only security will come from society. We need numbers and speed and we need to remove power from sociopaths. Those most in need of protection are in jails and mental institutions and their testimony needs to be heard urgently. We will not bring a powerful sociopathic mafia to justice through encrypted email. Burkina Faso burned their parliament buildings and made at least a portion of their oligarchy flee the country in three days and they did not do it through online security, they used irl action. This mafia is not afraid of encryption (which they wrote) they are afraid of people speaking out loud.
Q: I just want to feel a little secure online? >_<
A: Oh all right, if you want online security tips ask @SamuraiLucy.
Q: Ok. I agree with #opDeathEaters but there are a lot of people talking to me who just want a few little things changed to make it more reasonable. They think it would help us achieve our goals if we made some slight modifications to the objective and used words these people are more comfortable with and appealed to a more mainstream audience and got some celebrities to endorse us and formed an NGO and collected funding and distanced ourselves from all the controversial people behind this op. They tell me that I am very reasonable and if only I distanced myself from these controversial aspects and people I could be a CEO of the new OpDeathEaters NGO and probably have a career in politics and really make a difference.
A: Please read:
How corporations defeat grassroots movements: (Thank you Jeremy Hammond.) popularresistance.org/heres-how-the-corporations-defeat-political-movements/
Concern troll: http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/concern_troll
In particular note from first link:
Activist subtypes: “radicals, idealists, realists and opportunists.”
Radical activists “want to change the system; have underlying socio/political motives’ and see multinational corporations as ‘inherently evil’, do not trust the … federal, state and local governments to protect them and to safeguard the environment. They believe, rather, that individuals and local groups should have direct power over industry … I would categorize their principal aims … as social justice and political empowerment.”
The “idealist” is easier to deal with.
“Idealists…want a perfect world…Because of their intrinsic altruism, however, … [they] have a vulnerable point,” he told the audience. “If they can be shown that their position is in opposition to an industry … and cannot be ethically justified, they [will] change their position.”
The two easiest subtypes to join the corporate side of the fight are the “realists” and the “opportunists.” By definition, an “opportunist” takes the opportunity to side with the powerful for career gain and has skin in the game for “visibility, power [and] followers.”
The realist, by contrast, is more complex but the most important piece of the puzzle, says Duchin.
“[Realists are able to] live with trade-offs; willing to work within the system; not interested in radical change; pragmatic. The realists should always receive the highest priority in any strategy dealing with a public policy issue.”
Duchin outlined a corresponding three-step strategy to “deal with” these four activist subtypes. First, isolate the radicals. Second, “cultivate” the idealists and “educate” them into becoming realists. And finally, co-opt the realists.
“If your industry can successfully bring about these relationships, the credibility of the radicals will be lost and opportunists can be counted on to share in the final policy solution.”
Q: Well, I can’t help being taken in by feds. I am just too trusting, I am such an honest and caring person myself I could never understand how others could be dishonest. I just like to believe the best about people, I’m not a cynic or a pessimist like others. It’s just not in my nature to not talk to these people and attempt to bring them in and reach a compromise because I am a kind and loving person and I just can’t be rude when they are being so kind to me.
A: You are an unprincipled, weak-willed narcissist. You cannot resist flattery and you are not-so-secretly jealous of those with stronger principles than you and you wish to feel superior by presenting derailment as ‘reasonable’. You are helping derail the objective and the movement and you can’t sit with us.
Q: Ok, I don’t want to be taken in by feds but I see the UK army just added 1500 troops to conduct a propaganda war on Facebook and Twitter along with all the other government socks that were already there. How will I know who these people are?
A: By their techniques. They aim to co-opt, divide and divert. If an idea is anonymous, they will prop up media friendly poppets to claim the idea as their own and divert followers to worthless or harmful objectives (see Sabu or Occupy). With an idea such as OpDeathEaters they would dismiss it as a product of the sensational, poorly researched sites that previously enabled the topic to be dismissed as lunacy. If an idea had an origin, they will discredit the origin. (‘Turing believes machines think. Turing lies with men. Therefore, machines don’t think.’) If an idea has an origin that nothing is known about, that will be portrayed as untrustworthy. If the origin is a well known personality then everything they have ever done will be attacked and they will be portrayed as a ‘narcissist’ and ‘personality cult’ for being well known. Any known person involved at any level will be used as an excuse to divide (‘I love what you are doing but I can’t work on anything X is involved in.’)
The solution is to ignore personalities and block anyone who tries to derail into discussion of personalities. OpDeathEaters is idea driven, stigmergic action, our focus is on the objective and data.
Q: If we just focus on the objective they can’t stop us?
A: Of course they can try. They can redefine the meaning of the objective or each of the words in it and attack each word separately. They can do everything possible to intimidate witnesses, victims, investigators and everyone else involved. They can co-opt panels. They can even flee to other countries and fake their own deaths as the nazis did before Nuremberg. They are currently doing every one of those things, but we have the momentum and they are crumbling.
Q: In the meantime, these trolls on the tag and in my timeline are driving me crazy. What do I say to them?
A: Nothing. They have elite, specialized training in how to drive you crazy. If everyone on the tag uses the block button they can’t do their jobs, they are paid to engage you. Do not engage with intelligence agents trained to divert you.
Q: Who wrote all this crap and who did they go to for authority?
A: Heather Marsh (@georgiebc) and she went to herself.
If you have any further questions feel free to ask any of our main accounts, thank you. Please translate and share the FAQ widely, Hashtag: #OpDeathEaters